Also, the legal basis in the ruling is flimsy at best, given the policy of almost every legitimate athletic commission in the country. If someone had the money to sue the commission for the records, they would likely win in the end.

It’s also amusing that the ruling says, “We have also received comments from Zuffa, LLC, d/b/a/ Ultimate Fighting Championship (”Zuffa”),” but later says, “As our ruling is dispositive, we need not address Zuffa’s arguments.”

(feel free to change the curse words in the next paragraph to “f—ing” if you’d like, I don’t know what your policy is)

I wonder what that legal document from Zuffa to the appeals board looked like. Somehow I doubt it said “Don’t ******* ask me about ******* numbers! The fighters are making great ******* money! There’s not a single fighter who has complained about their ******* salary! And they don’t even ******* want to know what the **** the other fighters are making! You should worry about how much ******* money you’re making and mind your own ******* business!” although if it did say that, it would be an overwhelmingly convincing argument.