<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liddell vs Silva NOT at UFC 76?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/</link>
	<description>...MMA News and Analysis...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8604</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8604</guid>
		<description>GUYS 
u know who hella sucks JAMES THOMPSON he got koed in like 13 seconds the guys big for nothing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GUYS<br />
u know who hella sucks JAMES THOMPSON he got koed in like 13 seconds the guys big for nothing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8512</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 18:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8512</guid>
		<description>mmahero 
i respect what u are saying but to say chuck aint no striker come on guy out of twenty wins he has 13 kos but after the head kick to babalou all his fights have ended in either ko or tko so to say now he is a boring fighter no way bud before maybe but not now u know when he steps in the ring somebodys getting koed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmahero<br />
i respect what u are saying but to say chuck aint no striker come on guy out of twenty wins he has 13 kos but after the head kick to babalou all his fights have ended in either ko or tko so to say now he is a boring fighter no way bud before maybe but not now u know when he steps in the ring somebodys getting koed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.J. St.Croix</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8509</link>
		<dc:creator>R.J. St.Croix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8509</guid>
		<description>wow there is a lot of Liddell hate going on these days eh? everyone likes to say Chuck is over hyped and hes was never really that good but i dont think that is the whole truth, i think when Liddell was that unbeatable fighter he was just a little ahead of the game and now the rest of the field is catching up. up intill a few months ago people though only one or two fighters had a shot at beating Liddell now people see there is a whole bunch of guys that have a chance and they are saying Liddell sucks. Liddell didnt become a sh*tty fighter everyone else just got better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow there is a lot of Liddell hate going on these days eh? everyone likes to say Chuck is over hyped and hes was never really that good but i dont think that is the whole truth, i think when Liddell was that unbeatable fighter he was just a little ahead of the game and now the rest of the field is catching up. up intill a few months ago people though only one or two fighters had a shot at beating Liddell now people see there is a whole bunch of guys that have a chance and they are saying Liddell sucks. Liddell didnt become a sh*tty fighter everyone else just got better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmahero</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8508</link>
		<dc:creator>mmahero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8508</guid>
		<description>Richard
Do u actually think chuck's a great striker?  Chuck is hyped up to be a great striker. He has never knockout a fellow striker.  Silva has.

The only problem with silva is he throws wild punches every so often and chuck, having reach advantage, could sneak one in to catch him.  

I'm not against chuck but I don't like him too much because he is all hyped up to be better than he actually is.  He is the best man to learn from if u have to fight a wrestler.  He doesn't believe in full guard once he is on the ground.  He will just try to stand up immediately regardless of what u do to him.  In terms of striking, i don't see chuck as having any edge over silva.

Plus, all chuck's fight is boring because he is always back paddling.  His fight is only interesting if someone comes forward to him a lot. Try watching him fighting jeremy horn 2.  If u can't sleep at night, u put that on, i guarantee u will fall asleep in no time.  Rampage got so bored in fighting chuck in the second fight that he has to gesture chuck to come in and engage, remember?

All i want is exciting fight.  Chuck's fight is not.  Mark my word.  Chuck will never become light heavyweight champion again.  I'm  not saying that because of his age. I'm saying that because ufc light heavyweight division is filled with striker nowadays eg. Dan henderson, rampage, shogun, lyoto, ?silva etc

I will love to see keith jardine fighting chuck.  It's about time that chuck get exposed. We will probably see a 3 rounds uanimous decision.  I hope chuck do win because if he loses, i will be very disappointed that he is so fake.  Chuck needs to have at least two wins over decent fellow strikers in a roll to prove that I'm wrong.  Whatever the pundit said before between chuck vs rampage ufc 71, I put my money on rampage.  I know I will win. See what happen now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard<br />
Do u actually think chuck&#8217;s a great striker?  Chuck is hyped up to be a great striker. He has never knockout a fellow striker.  Silva has.</p>
<p>The only problem with silva is he throws wild punches every so often and chuck, having reach advantage, could sneak one in to catch him.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not against chuck but I don&#8217;t like him too much because he is all hyped up to be better than he actually is.  He is the best man to learn from if u have to fight a wrestler.  He doesn&#8217;t believe in full guard once he is on the ground.  He will just try to stand up immediately regardless of what u do to him.  In terms of striking, i don&#8217;t see chuck as having any edge over silva.</p>
<p>Plus, all chuck&#8217;s fight is boring because he is always back paddling.  His fight is only interesting if someone comes forward to him a lot. Try watching him fighting jeremy horn 2.  If u can&#8217;t sleep at night, u put that on, i guarantee u will fall asleep in no time.  Rampage got so bored in fighting chuck in the second fight that he has to gesture chuck to come in and engage, remember?</p>
<p>All i want is exciting fight.  Chuck&#8217;s fight is not.  Mark my word.  Chuck will never become light heavyweight champion again.  I&#8217;m  not saying that because of his age. I&#8217;m saying that because ufc light heavyweight division is filled with striker nowadays eg. Dan henderson, rampage, shogun, lyoto, ?silva etc</p>
<p>I will love to see keith jardine fighting chuck.  It&#8217;s about time that chuck get exposed. We will probably see a 3 rounds uanimous decision.  I hope chuck do win because if he loses, i will be very disappointed that he is so fake.  Chuck needs to have at least two wins over decent fellow strikers in a roll to prove that I&#8217;m wrong.  Whatever the pundit said before between chuck vs rampage ufc 71, I put my money on rampage.  I know I will win. See what happen now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8504</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 06:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8504</guid>
		<description>i have one kid and ur on for a hundred but lets make it double if someone gets koed in the first</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have one kid and ur on for a hundred but lets make it double if someone gets koed in the first</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMAKansas</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8503</link>
		<dc:creator>MMAKansas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 03:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8503</guid>
		<description>@Richard
Ahhh man, you wont ever just "melt" and neither will I.. here's the deal, I bet 100  Wand wins...  you can match that... and we can stop there before DrJ intervenes and informs us that betting online is illegal and we are putting MMAHQ at risk!.. Lol kidding,, but I really don't bet, however I feel like I could really clean up on this deal, and since I have been running my mouth for so long about this I figured I should back it up. No need for $500 bets, buy your kids some shoes man, forget this... lol $100 is a good bet, but see now I know you aren't that confident in your boy, otherwise you would have said "heck yeah I will bet you 5K right now... lol

Wand wins ... now I am thinking more like round 1 knockout.. lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard<br />
Ahhh man, you wont ever just &#8220;melt&#8221; and neither will I.. here&#8217;s the deal, I bet 100  Wand wins&#8230;  you can match that&#8230; and we can stop there before DrJ intervenes and informs us that betting online is illegal and we are putting MMAHQ at risk!.. Lol kidding,, but I really don&#8217;t bet, however I feel like I could really clean up on this deal, and since I have been running my mouth for so long about this I figured I should back it up. No need for $500 bets, buy your kids some shoes man, forget this&#8230; lol $100 is a good bet, but see now I know you aren&#8217;t that confident in your boy, otherwise you would have said &#8220;heck yeah I will bet you 5K right now&#8230; lol</p>
<p>Wand wins &#8230; now I am thinking more like round 1 knockout.. lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8502</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 01:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8502</guid>
		<description>for sure and that fight is happening for sure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for sure and that fight is happening for sure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bvrasp</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8501</link>
		<dc:creator>bvrasp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 01:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8501</guid>
		<description>LOL Rich its a tough call man! thats all i know for sure, either one of these guys can stop the fight in a heartbeat, thats what makes this fight so exciting.  

Im not betting on this fight.. but were still on for the Sherk vs BJ hehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL Rich its a tough call man! thats all i know for sure, either one of these guys can stop the fight in a heartbeat, thats what makes this fight so exciting.  </p>
<p>Im not betting on this fight.. but were still on for the Sherk vs BJ hehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8500</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8500</guid>
		<description>actually bvrasp i get my income tax check in january febuary and then ill have about 5 grand so to lose 500 dollars wouldnt hurt so much but if it was the year of the under dog shouldnt i bet 5 now if chucks the underdogLOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually bvrasp i get my income tax check in january febuary and then ill have about 5 grand so to lose 500 dollars wouldnt hurt so much but if it was the year of the under dog shouldnt i bet 5 now if chucks the underdogLOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bvrasp</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8499</link>
		<dc:creator>bvrasp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/07/12/liddell-vs-silva-not-at-ufc-76/#comment-8499</guid>
		<description>you certaily are a betting man rich lol, thats a huge bet on what almost might be a coin flip.  I personally give Wandy the edge.. so make it what? 60-40? its still a coin flip, i dont think anyone imagines this fight to be much more than a coin flip.  Like i said, not just because of the matchup, but because its a fight! 

I like your reasoning of 100 in 2007 and 500 in 2008, we all know 07 is the year of the underdogs, its not even a joke anymore.. its a fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you certaily are a betting man rich lol, thats a huge bet on what almost might be a coin flip.  I personally give Wandy the edge.. so make it what? 60-40? its still a coin flip, i dont think anyone imagines this fight to be much more than a coin flip.  Like i said, not just because of the matchup, but because its a fight! </p>
<p>I like your reasoning of 100 in 2007 and 500 in 2008, we all know 07 is the year of the underdogs, its not even a joke anymore.. its a fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
