<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chuck Liddell vs. Quinton Jackson at UFC 71</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/</link>
	<description>...MMA News and Analysis...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:22:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMAKansas</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/comment-page-14/#comment-10668</link>
		<dc:creator>MMAKansas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/#comment-10668</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;10657&quot;]SO DOC DOES HE HAVE HIV OR WHAT????????[/quote]

Norm Frauenheim reports in the Arizona Rebublic that Morrison&#039;s former agent, Randy Lang, said Morrison recently tested positive for HIV in mandatory blood tests for a boxing license in Arizona, a charge the boxer has denied. Morrison, 38, says that even the original test in Las Vegas that disqualified him was a false-positive. But Dr. Margaret Goodman, who worked as a physician for the Nevada Athletic Commission at the time, writes at Secondsout.com that &quot;he was tested twice. The results were checked and rechecked by the most reputable lab in the country and deemed indisputable.&quot; Howard Reynolds, a boxing writer who who by day works as an M.D., writes at RingsideReport.com that &quot;Morrison has no business, nor any right, as a participant in any combat sport.&quot; 

He has HIV.. is on meds to make the resemblance of it go down in tests, and most likely wont fight again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="10657"]SO DOC DOES HE HAVE HIV OR WHAT????????[/quote]</p>
<p>Norm Frauenheim reports in the Arizona Rebublic that Morrison&#8217;s former agent, Randy Lang, said Morrison recently tested positive for HIV in mandatory blood tests for a boxing license in Arizona, a charge the boxer has denied. Morrison, 38, says that even the original test in Las Vegas that disqualified him was a false-positive. But Dr. Margaret Goodman, who worked as a physician for the Nevada Athletic Commission at the time, writes at Secondsout.com that &#8220;he was tested twice. The results were checked and rechecked by the most reputable lab in the country and deemed indisputable.&#8221; Howard Reynolds, a boxing writer who who by day works as an M.D., writes at RingsideReport.com that &#8220;Morrison has no business, nor any right, as a participant in any combat sport.&#8221; </p>
<p>He has HIV.. is on meds to make the resemblance of it go down in tests, and most likely wont fight again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PATRICK</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/comment-page-14/#comment-10657</link>
		<dc:creator>PATRICK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/#comment-10657</guid>
		<description>SO DOC DOES HE HAVE HIV OR WHAT????????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SO DOC DOES HE HAVE HIV OR WHAT????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr J</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/comment-page-14/#comment-10656</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/#comment-10656</guid>
		<description>He did fight but it wasn&#039;t an MMA fight.  While it was supposed to be, about an hour before the match they changed the rules so there were no kicks allowed and no ground work.  Only strikes and strikes from the clinch.

It was really just a modified boxing match.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He did fight but it wasn&#8217;t an MMA fight.  While it was supposed to be, about an hour before the match they changed the rules so there were no kicks allowed and no ground work.  Only strikes and strikes from the clinch.</p>
<p>It was really just a modified boxing match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PATRICK</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/comment-page-13/#comment-10655</link>
		<dc:creator>PATRICK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/#comment-10655</guid>
		<description>DOC....

WHAT IS THE WORD ON TOMMY MORRISON..??? I HEARD HE RETESTED IS HE POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE... DIDNT HE HAVE A PRO MMA FIGHT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DOC&#8230;.</p>
<p>WHAT IS THE WORD ON TOMMY MORRISON..??? I HEARD HE RETESTED IS HE POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE&#8230; DIDNT HE HAVE A PRO MMA FIGHT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr J</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/comment-page-13/#comment-10654</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/#comment-10654</guid>
		<description>yeah this post has the most comments by almost double.  here are the top ten:

    * Chuck Liddell vs. Quinton Jackson at UFC 71 - 648 comments
    * Tommy Morrison vs Chuck Liddell? - 361 comments
    * Liddell vs Rampage: Fight Week - 227 comments
    * Randy Couture vs Tim Syliva at UFC 68? - 218 comments
    * UFC 70: Nations Collide Fighter Payouts - 188 comments
    * Tito Ortiz vs. Chuck Liddell II at UFC 66 - 170 comments
    * WEC on Versus Network - 167 comments
    * Liddell vs Rampage Preview? - 160 comments
    * Pride 33: The Second Coming Preview - 136 comments
    * UFC first woman fighter! - 129 comments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah this post has the most comments by almost double.  here are the top ten:</p>
<p>    * Chuck Liddell vs. Quinton Jackson at UFC 71 &#8211; 648 comments<br />
    * Tommy Morrison vs Chuck Liddell? &#8211; 361 comments<br />
    * Liddell vs Rampage: Fight Week &#8211; 227 comments<br />
    * Randy Couture vs Tim Syliva at UFC 68? &#8211; 218 comments<br />
    * UFC 70: Nations Collide Fighter Payouts &#8211; 188 comments<br />
    * Tito Ortiz vs. Chuck Liddell II at UFC 66 &#8211; 170 comments<br />
    * WEC on Versus Network &#8211; 167 comments<br />
    * Liddell vs Rampage Preview? &#8211; 160 comments<br />
    * Pride 33: The Second Coming Preview &#8211; 136 comments<br />
    * UFC first woman fighter! &#8211; 129 comments</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.J. St.Croix</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/comment-page-13/#comment-10653</link>
		<dc:creator>R.J. St.Croix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/#comment-10653</guid>
		<description>hey Doc is this the most commented blog? its funny to go back and read a lot of the older post on here there is some funny sh*t. and i noticed that not very many people on here were giving Rampage a chance in the fight with Liddell myself included wow were we wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Doc is this the most commented blog? its funny to go back and read a lot of the older post on here there is some funny sh*t. and i noticed that not very many people on here were giving Rampage a chance in the fight with Liddell myself included wow were we wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PATRICK</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/comment-page-13/#comment-10650</link>
		<dc:creator>PATRICK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/#comment-10650</guid>
		<description>HOLY SHIT ... THIS BLOG HAS OVER 600 COMMENTS DAMN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOLY <acronym title="SHIT">****</acronym> &#8230; THIS BLOG HAS OVER 600 COMMENTS DAMN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meedao.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Chuck Liddell vs. Quinton Jackson at UFC 71</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/comment-page-13/#comment-9670</link>
		<dc:creator>Meedao.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Chuck Liddell vs. Quinton Jackson at UFC 71</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 07:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/#comment-9670</guid>
		<description>[...] Full Article:Â  Here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Full Article:Â  Here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zak</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/comment-page-13/#comment-9198</link>
		<dc:creator>zak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/#comment-9198</guid>
		<description>WHY DID EVERYONE STOP COMMENTING HERE???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHY DID EVERYONE STOP COMMENTING HERE???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dayday</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/comment-page-13/#comment-8840</link>
		<dc:creator>dayday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/2007/02/10/chuck-liddell-vs-quinton-jackson-at-ufc-71/#comment-8840</guid>
		<description>zak

....like i dont understand how you think dude..
how can u even begin to downplay the shogun hype and categorize him as an &quot;up and comming&quot; fighter??  buddy..hes 16-2...13 of those wins are from kos 1 loss was cause he fell awkward and broke his forarm and couldnt continue. and the other one was by sobral...dont even try to argue the fact that chuck knocked out sobral, because the only reason why that happened is cause sobral tried to fight chucks game, and he paid for it.. .not to mention that his opponents were well chosen..clearly.... shogun has defeated the likes of Overeem, noguira, cyborg, arona, and jackson...infact he murdered jackson...he shows you all levels of his skills weather it be on the ground or standing up, either way he excels..
like your clearly on ass crack if you honestly think that chuck is a better fighter than him...chuck is a kickboxer who doesnt use leg kicks too much...chuck is a defensive fighter...chuck apparently  has a ground game, but were yet to witness any if it...oh yeah..he choked put kenneth williams in 99...so what that was 8 years ago..
Shogun, is an explosive mma fighter, hes soo well versed on the ground and stand up..hes from chuteboxe for fuck sakes.. he fought in vale tudo and beat the shit out of ppl....and yeah  i also know chuck fought in vale tudo , and got a decision over pele...so what..
and him having a problem with kicks to the head?? buddy..d you honestly think that shogun is not gonna train not gonna practice and get himself adjusted to the  octagon and octagon rules? everyy one talks about how pride fighters would be screwed in the octagon, yet of the few that have migrated across... have  faced this problem, or have been disqualified for  breakin the rules..aka head kicks and such?? and do you really think that  kickin someone down is the only thing shogun is capable of doing?? you need to watch less highlight reels and focus in on the facts bud...because really and truly,  although chuck maybe a wicked striker with amazing take down defense, and some bjj...i still think shogun is a better fighter hands down, i dont care what anyone says, because unless you can prove chuck is more than what hes shown himself to be which is a straight striker, hes still juss an old school fighter...one dimensional..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zak</p>
<p>&#8230;.like i dont understand how you think dude..<br />
how can u even begin to downplay the shogun hype and categorize him as an &#8220;up and comming&#8221; fighter??  buddy..hes 16-2&#8230;13 of those wins are from kos 1 loss was cause he fell awkward and broke his forarm and couldnt continue. and the other one was by sobral&#8230;dont even try to argue the fact that chuck knocked out sobral, because the only reason why that happened is cause sobral tried to fight chucks game, and he paid for it.. .not to mention that his opponents were well chosen..clearly&#8230;. shogun has defeated the likes of Overeem, noguira, cyborg, arona, and jackson&#8230;infact he murdered jackson&#8230;he shows you all levels of his skills weather it be on the ground or standing up, either way he excels..<br />
like your clearly on <acronym title="ass">***</acronym> crack if you honestly think that chuck is a better fighter than him&#8230;chuck is a kickboxer who doesnt use leg kicks too much&#8230;chuck is a defensive fighter&#8230;chuck apparently  has a ground game, but were yet to witness any if it&#8230;oh yeah..he choked put kenneth williams in 99&#8230;so what that was 8 years ago..<br />
Shogun, is an explosive mma fighter, hes soo well versed on the ground and stand up..hes from chuteboxe for <acronym title="fuck">****</acronym> sakes.. he fought in vale tudo and beat the <acronym title="shit">****</acronym> out of ppl&#8230;.and yeah  i also know chuck fought in vale tudo , and got a decision over pele&#8230;so what..<br />
and him having a problem with kicks to the head?? buddy..d you honestly think that shogun is not gonna train not gonna practice and get himself adjusted to the  octagon and octagon rules? everyy one talks about how pride fighters would be screwed in the octagon, yet of the few that have migrated across&#8230; have  faced this problem, or have been disqualified for  breakin the rules..aka head kicks and such?? and do you really think that  kickin someone down is the only thing shogun is capable of doing?? you need to watch less highlight reels and focus in on the facts bud&#8230;because really and truly,  although chuck maybe a wicked striker with amazing take down defense, and some bjj&#8230;i still think shogun is a better fighter hands down, i dont care what anyone says, because unless you can prove chuck is more than what hes shown himself to be which is a straight striker, hes still juss an old school fighter&#8230;one dimensional..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

