Comments on: FightMetric Analysis of Liddell vs Silva http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/ ...MMA News and Analysis... Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:22:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: R.J. St.Croix http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/comment-page-1/#comment-13045 R.J. St.Croix Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:58:46 +0000 http://www.mmahq.com/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/#comment-13045 dude what are you talking about? nobody is making excuses for anything. Chuck won the fight and as far i know no one is disputing that fact. the thing that people are arguing over is whether Wandi won round two or not, and if you are the MMA fan you claim to be and you actually watched the fight you would be able to admit that round two was at very least a very close round. dude what are you talking about? nobody is making excuses for anything. Chuck won the fight and as far i know no one is disputing that fact. the thing that people are arguing over is whether Wandi won round two or not, and if you are the MMA fan you claim to be and you actually watched the fight you would be able to admit that round two was at very least a very close round.

]]> By: fletcher http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/comment-page-1/#comment-13042 fletcher Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:28:08 +0000 http://www.mmahq.com/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/#comment-13042 excuses excuses chuck won that fare and sqaure if they fought again it would be the same thing chuck is a better stand up fighter. I heard that silva had to go to the hospital something about his eye his face was a wreck thats what you get when you stand with chuck. excuses excuses chuck won that fare and sqaure if they fought again it would be the same thing chuck is a better stand up fighter.

I heard that silva had to go to the hospital something about his eye his face was a wreck thats what you get when you stand with chuck.

]]> By: PATRICK http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/comment-page-1/#comment-12872 PATRICK Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:30:20 +0000 http://www.mmahq.com/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/#comment-12872 lol so he wasnt even champ and wore it out anyways lol so he wasnt even champ and wore it out anyways

]]> By: Dr J http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/comment-page-1/#comment-12871 Dr J Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:08:34 +0000 http://www.mmahq.com/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/#comment-12871 No, each time a belt is given its actually a new belt. Matt Hughes probably has 7 belts. If you remember BJ Penn kept his belt even though he was out of the UFC and when he returned to the UFC he wore it into the arena in his fight with Hughes. No, each time a belt is given its actually a new belt. Matt Hughes probably has 7 belts. If you remember BJ Penn kept his belt even though he was out of the UFC and when he returned to the UFC he wore it into the arena in his fight with Hughes.

]]> By: PATRICK http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/comment-page-1/#comment-12870 PATRICK Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:55:35 +0000 http://www.mmahq.com/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/#comment-12870 doc i was reading on mania.com that ricco is selling his belt... how does that work.. i thought everytime u lose the belt u give it back hows that work... doc

i was reading on mania.com that ricco is selling his belt… how does that work.. i thought everytime u lose the belt u give it back hows that work…

]]> By: R.J. St.Croix http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/comment-page-1/#comment-12868 R.J. St.Croix Thu, 03 Jan 2008 08:56:31 +0000 http://www.mmahq.com/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/#comment-12868 SPEAK TO THESE MUTHAFUCKAS YODA! there not a whole lot about judging in MMA that i really like, i dont give a gawd damn what anyone says its hard to say who wins in a fight that did really end. what if the fight went 7 more rounds would Chuck have still won? he was looking pretty tired. what if the fight had no rounds would Wand have made it past the 10 min. mark? Chuck was finding his range and tagging Wandi good and often. as far as im concerned between Chuck and Wanderlei there was no BETTER man that night. Chuck Liddell was the smarter athlete and won the match based on the rules set out for him and thats what really counts i guess but does that really make him the better fighter? SPEAK TO THESE MUTHAFUCKAS YODA! there not a whole lot about judging in MMA that i really like, i dont give a gawd damn what anyone says its hard to say who wins in a fight that did really end. what if the fight went 7 more rounds would Chuck have still won? he was looking pretty tired. what if the fight had no rounds would Wand have made it past the 10 min. mark? Chuck was finding his range and tagging Wandi good and often. as far as im concerned between Chuck and Wanderlei there was no BETTER man that night. Chuck Liddell was the smarter athlete and won the match based on the rules set out for him and thats what really counts i guess but does that really make him the better fighter?

]]> By: bvrasp http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/comment-page-1/#comment-12865 bvrasp Thu, 03 Jan 2008 01:56:23 +0000 http://www.mmahq.com/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/#comment-12865 uhh.. ya, i thought the breakdown was basically a bunch of BS. Ive checked out a few breakdowns from fightmetric in the past and personally im not a fan of their system of logic. They gather a bunch of facts and use deductive reasoning to come to highly questionable conclusions. This isnt boxing guys.. in mma a high Jab count could work against you just as easily as it works for you. Its about doing what works best and capitalizing on opportunities. The best tactic is to take what your opponent gives you, be patient and dont try to force anything. Dumb stats like that dont prove anything man, jab % in mma, blah.. doesnt mean anything man. Why dont they count the ratio of headfakes to strikes? or the ratio of quick kicks to hard haymaker kicks? because its ridiculous to even bother counting and no conclusions can be made of the outcome. Styles make fights, but fights also make styles, depending who your fighting. Look at GSP Hughes 3, perfect example, GSP is known to throw alot of jabs, but in this last fight his jap % was way down, because he was concentrating of his wrestling. He wasnt worried about Hughes striking and throwing 100 jabs would really just be a waste of time and energy. He benefited by NOT throwing alot of jabs and changing his game up more towards the wrestling aspect. uhh.. ya, i thought the breakdown was basically a bunch of BS. Ive checked out a few breakdowns from fightmetric in the past and personally im not a fan of their system of logic. They gather a bunch of facts and use deductive reasoning to come to highly questionable conclusions.

This isnt boxing guys.. in mma a high Jab count could work against you just as easily as it works for you. Its about doing what works best and capitalizing on opportunities. The best tactic is to take what your opponent gives you, be patient and dont try to force anything.

Dumb stats like that dont prove anything man, jab % in mma, blah.. doesnt mean anything man. Why dont they count the ratio of headfakes to strikes? or the ratio of quick kicks to hard haymaker kicks? because its ridiculous to even bother counting and no conclusions can be made of the outcome.

Styles make fights, but fights also make styles, depending who your fighting. Look at GSP Hughes 3, perfect example, GSP is known to throw alot of jabs, but in this last fight his *** % was way down, because he was concentrating of his wrestling. He wasnt worried about Hughes striking and throwing 100 jabs would really just be a waste of time and energy. He benefited by NOT throwing alot of jabs and changing his game up more towards the wrestling aspect.

]]> By: PATRICK http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/comment-page-1/#comment-12858 PATRICK Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:17:01 +0000 http://www.mmahq.com/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/#comment-12858 doc props again on the site ... it looks so much better... when my associate and i lauch ours welld definetly have a link for yours as the premier mma website... doc props again on the site … it looks so much better… when my associate and i lauch ours welld definetly have a link for yours as the premier mma website…

]]> By: PATRICK http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/comment-page-1/#comment-12857 PATRICK Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:48:54 +0000 http://www.mmahq.com/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/#comment-12857 kansas ur boy needs to go back to chutebox.. and the the fukk doesnt he throw jabs.... what the fukks up with that bro... is he more of a homerun swinger and not trying to pick people apart like that shit chuck does? kansas

ur boy needs to go back to chutebox.. and the the **** doesnt he throw jabs…. what the fukks up with that bro… is he more of a homerun swinger and not trying to pick people apart like that **** chuck does?

]]> By: PATRICK http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/comment-page-1/#comment-12855 PATRICK Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:25:45 +0000 http://www.mmahq.com/2008/01/02/fightmetric-analysis-of-chuck-liddell-vs-wanderlei-silva-fight/#comment-12855 interesting interesting

]]>