<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strikeforce: Destruction Recap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/11/22/strikeforce-destruction-recap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/11/22/strikeforce-destruction-recap/</link>
	<description>...MMA News and Analysis...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:22:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bvrasp</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/11/22/strikeforce-destruction-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-17724</link>
		<dc:creator>bvrasp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/?p=2300#comment-17724</guid>
		<description>Thats true Richard, but that was in Pride, in the UFC Wandy is 1-1 and Rampage is the ex-champ.  It might not make sense, but thats how its gonna be, i personally think its a toss up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats true Richard, but that was in Pride, in the UFC Wandy is 1-1 and Rampage is the ex-champ.  It might not make sense, but thats how its gonna be, i personally think its a toss up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/11/22/strikeforce-destruction-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-17723</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/?p=2300#comment-17723</guid>
		<description>i have to agree with being in rampages head.as for betting odds i like rampage to win but i would of guessed it would be a underdog bet since wandy has beaten rampage twice before</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have to agree with being in rampages head.as for betting odds i like rampage to win but i would of guessed it would be a underdog bet since wandy has beaten rampage twice before</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bvrasp</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/11/22/strikeforce-destruction-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-17722</link>
		<dc:creator>bvrasp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/?p=2300#comment-17722</guid>
		<description>As for Wandy vs Rampage 3, its a whole different fight than the first 2 in pride were.  Rampage is a much more difficult opponent than he used to be, hes actually TRAINING for fights these days.  Hes making more money and taking MMA more seriously, these two factors have put him one step closer to his full potential as a fighter.

Wanderlei has also improved in the scientific sense of his training/nutrition regimen.  The problem is Wandy has taken alot more damage than Rampage has over the years and hes got tons of scar tissue, old injuries, etc..

I can say with 100% confidence that Rampage will be coming in as the favorite in this fight as far as the betting lines are concerned.

BUT, regardless of all that, im STILL picking Wandy to win!! I think hes in Rampages head, plus i think hes just mentally stronger than Rampage in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for Wandy vs Rampage 3, its a whole different fight than the first 2 in pride were.  Rampage is a much more difficult opponent than he used to be, hes actually TRAINING for fights these days.  Hes making more money and taking MMA more seriously, these two factors have put him one step closer to his full potential as a fighter.</p>
<p>Wanderlei has also improved in the scientific sense of his training/nutrition regimen.  The problem is Wandy has taken alot more damage than Rampage has over the years and hes got tons of scar tissue, old injuries, etc..</p>
<p>I can say with 100% confidence that Rampage will be coming in as the favorite in this fight as far as the betting lines are concerned.</p>
<p>BUT, regardless of all that, im STILL picking Wandy to win!! I think hes in Rampages head, plus i think hes just mentally stronger than Rampage in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/11/22/strikeforce-destruction-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-17720</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/?p=2300#comment-17720</guid>
		<description>i dont say things on here unless i mean them,i do think rampage is going to win against wandy the third time around,and this new found wandy ur talking about koed KEITH JARDINE my friend someone who has been on the oppeset end of a very ko plenty of times.i just think liddel and rampage are at the same points in there carrer,liddel towards the end and rampage maybe cresting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont say things on here unless i mean them,i do think rampage is going to win against wandy the third time around,and this new found wandy ur talking about koed KEITH JARDINE my friend someone who has been on the oppeset end of a very ko plenty of times.i just think liddel and rampage are at the same points in there carrer,liddel towards the end and rampage maybe cresting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bvrasp</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/11/22/strikeforce-destruction-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-17719</link>
		<dc:creator>bvrasp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/?p=2300#comment-17719</guid>
		<description>@Kansas, 

Whats with this comment? What Richard said must have really bugged you, cuz its like your attacking the whole site saying its mundane unless your here.  Lately youve had this troll gatties type attitude towards everyone and i dont know why.  You post things like, i dont care what you guys think, im gonna keep coming to this site, etc..

You act like everyone is against you, but nobody wants you to leave the site man, i dont know where you got that idea.  

You used to argue with Richard all the time, so why so sensitive all of a sudden?  You said my name twice in that post, saying half the comments on the site are mine but if you notice i dont have that many more comments than you do.  

Probably everytime i ask a question in a post i DO answer it myself, for example: 

&quot;who do you guys like in BJ vs GSP? im picking BJ because etc.....&quot; 

So whats wrong with that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kansas, </p>
<p>Whats with this comment? What Richard said must have really bugged you, cuz its like your attacking the whole site saying its mundane unless your here.  Lately youve had this troll gatties type attitude towards everyone and i dont know why.  You post things like, i dont care what you guys think, im gonna keep coming to this site, etc..</p>
<p>You act like everyone is against you, but nobody wants you to leave the site man, i dont know where you got that idea.  </p>
<p>You used to argue with Richard all the time, so why so sensitive all of a sudden?  You said my name twice in that post, saying half the comments on the site are mine but if you notice i dont have that many more comments than you do.  </p>
<p>Probably everytime i ask a question in a post i DO answer it myself, for example: </p>
<p>&#8220;who do you guys like in BJ vs GSP? im picking BJ because etc&#8230;..&#8221; </p>
<p>So whats wrong with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMAKansas</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/11/22/strikeforce-destruction-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-17717</link>
		<dc:creator>MMAKansas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/?p=2300#comment-17717</guid>
		<description>@RJ

He&#039;s trying to make me mad... hehe... I don&#039;t blame him, without me arguing on here this site starts getting mundane, it consists of R.J and BV with an occasional Richard or Patrick stepping in, and the other half of the time its BV commenting, asking questions, then answering them himself.. lol

(Sorry that one about Quintin &quot;I like to eat knees&quot; Jackson was meant for Richard aka DIK) ... hahahahaha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@RJ</p>
<p>He&#8217;s trying to make me mad&#8230; hehe&#8230; I don&#8217;t blame him, without me arguing on here this site starts getting mundane, it consists of R.J and BV with an occasional Richard or Patrick stepping in, and the other half of the time its BV commenting, asking questions, then answering them himself.. lol</p>
<p>(Sorry that one about Quintin &#8220;I like to eat knees&#8221; Jackson was meant for Richard aka <acronym title="DIK">***</acronym>) &#8230; hahahahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMAKansas</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/11/22/strikeforce-destruction-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-17716</link>
		<dc:creator>MMAKansas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/?p=2300#comment-17716</guid>
		<description>@BV

I would love to see a Chuck v Wand rematch, 10 times if you will... that rematch would look something like Wand V Jardine, because Chuck would look to finish this time, and Wand would be more aggressive ... so bring it on.. Chuck couldn&#039;t knock Wand down with a shot in that fight, but Wand did knock Chuck down, twice I believe... I would love to see that rematch.. If Chuck V Wand had gone down like Wand V Rampage (take your pick both were brutal) then I would say Chucks just got his number, but since Chuck cannot finish fights anymore, I wouldn&#039;t give him the win at all... 

I think it would go like St. Pierre V Hughes # Two only via strikes....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BV</p>
<p>I would love to see a Chuck v Wand rematch, 10 times if you will&#8230; that rematch would look something like Wand V Jardine, because Chuck would look to finish this time, and Wand would be more aggressive &#8230; so bring it on.. Chuck couldn&#8217;t knock Wand down with a shot in that fight, but Wand did knock Chuck down, twice I believe&#8230; I would love to see that rematch.. If Chuck V Wand had gone down like Wand V Rampage (take your pick both were brutal) then I would say Chucks just got his number, but since Chuck cannot finish fights anymore, I wouldn&#8217;t give him the win at all&#8230; </p>
<p>I think it would go like St. Pierre V Hughes # Two only via strikes&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMAKansas</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/11/22/strikeforce-destruction-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-17715</link>
		<dc:creator>MMAKansas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/?p=2300#comment-17715</guid>
		<description>R.J.

After watching Rampages last two times with Wand, Wand&#039;s new found confidence, and Rampages WONDERFUL performance and focused life pre and post Forrest, I cannot wait for the 3rd go with Wand... I do think that you are just stirring this up, but go ahead, you haven&#039;t a leg to stand on and you know it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R.J.</p>
<p>After watching Rampages last two times with Wand, Wand&#8217;s new found confidence, and Rampages WONDERFUL performance and focused life pre and post Forrest, I cannot wait for the 3rd go with Wand&#8230; I do think that you are just stirring this up, but go ahead, you haven&#8217;t a leg to stand on and you know it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.J. St.Croix</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/11/22/strikeforce-destruction-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-17712</link>
		<dc:creator>R.J. St.Croix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/?p=2300#comment-17712</guid>
		<description>are you just saying that to piss off Kansas or do you really think Rampage has what it takes..... this time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you just saying that to piss off Kansas or do you really think Rampage has what it takes&#8230;.. this time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://www.mmahq.com/blog/2008/11/22/strikeforce-destruction-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-17710</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmahq.com/?p=2300#comment-17710</guid>
		<description>kansas
u shouldnt be putting rampage and liddel in the same boat,cuz u really be imbarrased when rampage ko&#039;s wandy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kansas<br />
u shouldnt be putting rampage and liddel in the same boat,cuz u really be imbarrased when rampage ko&#8217;s wandy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

